Homeless Bedford Reader

Joseph Papalexandrou The female genitaliavas I am analyzing is firmless written by Anna Quindlen. The essay can be found in The Bedford Reader 10th edition. My specialness it what brought me to this essay. The topic I am writing nearly is dispossessed citizens. What quests me about homeless people is that it never seems to bother them where there living. What also gave me interest is how do homeless people feed themselves with no money?I always wonder why homeless people dont look for money on the tracks and save what they find buys a meet of clothes and go for a job interview at McDonalds. The boilersuit message in this essay is that people make what they take home. If its living in a box or on the street they will always c completely that place home. It doesnt matter what you have but how you feel about what you have. If youre ok with where you auspicate home then that fine. The real message in this essay is that not all people depend on items or things they have to make them happy.The boilersuit tone in this essay is subjective and personal. Anna is trying to do a story on homeless people, and she found women called Ann on the back of a charabanc. Quindlen tries to get some information out of the women at the back of the bus and she is having a hard time doing so. In the story Quindlen goes back and aside with how she doesnt see the big jut in things. But she does engage up some personal information. There atomic number 18 no images in this essay although there the Quindlen likes to make a lot of understatements.She says that its not where you live or how big it is but that its the place you call home. So basically living in a box you can call home and it doesnt matter because its your home. That is a rattling big understatement. A lot of people like stability to be able to feed themselves everyday and be clean. The details and evidence that I found to support the main message in this story was when quindlen wrote They are not the homeless.T hey are people with no home. (Quindlen 200) That pretty much gives me the liveliness that she is saying that there is no unspoiled to look down on someone because they have no home and that it gives us no right to call someone homeless. In this essay there are parole &amp pathos. In the essay Quindlen started to do to a propound on homeless people and she even mentioned that she never seen the big picture up until she met Ann on the back of the bus. Quindlen started to no longer call homeless people homeless she instead refers them to people without a home.