Thursday, March 28, 2019
deviance :: essays research papers
abstract OF DEVIANCEIn the eighth chapter of Sociology, I. Robertson explains that there are many definitions slightly optical aberration but not enough, so he tries to find at hand(predicate) one and clarify the deviance. He starts with a question which is who is deviant? and inclination of an orbits of its answers.In the list of its answers, Robertson benefits from Simons study and he says that the words refer to pack and acts that other people strongly disapprove of (23).On the other hand, Robertson past counters it with conflicting topic of sociological literature.He claims that the concept of this definition is found slippery one by sociologists.After this idea,Robertson questions mo definition which is dviance is any behavior that doesnt conform to genial norms(24).However, Robertson judge this definiton as not helpful.He exemplifies that eating cardinal meals in a mean solar day can be deviant behavior for some unimportant loving norms.Therefore, Robertson argues that minor deviations arent included in the particular sociological interest.He claims that the principal(prenominal) idea of sociological interest is about violations which are regarded as repellant by majority of people. And he says that one word is stigma a bad reputation or disapproving by a stack of people. After this analysis, he benefits from second definition and improves it, so he eventually declares a definition, which is deviance refers to behavior or characteristics that violate significant social norms and expectations and are negatively valued by large numbers of people as a result(24). He emphasizes that this definition clarifies deviance more(prenominal) than others.He continues with clarification of deviance by helping of main three points. Firstly, he claims that there is no c ache relationship between deviance and statistical rarity. He exemplifies that jogging before the breakfast can be unusual statistically but not a reason for deviance. However, Roberts on then states that some norms can be modified or abandoned succession to time. He makes clear it with an example that premarital sex was prohibited in American society several years ago. However, nowadays the majority of American society admits this event normally. As a result, Robertson declares firmly that norms can lose their force or influence as time passes. Secondly, Robertson argues about naval division of normals and deviants. He explains briefly that there is no class between normals and deviants. He illustrates that if we divide people as thieves, patients (mental disordered) or drug users, we will abide a few normal people. In addition to them, Robertson says, deviance is relation back(25).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment